Originally published October 21 2003
X10 Pop-Under Screen Spammers Ordered To Pay $10 Million
by Mike Adams, NaturalNews Editor
X10, the company that loves to send you screen spam in the form of pop-under ads that hawk miniature video cameras, now owes the Vanderhook brothers $10 million. And for what? It was the Vanderhook brothers, not X10, that pioneered the pop-under ad distribution system, according to Vanderhook attorneys.
I'm not sure if this is good or bad. Pop-under ads are screen spam, plain and simple. They're hated by nearly all Internet users. That two pop-under screen spam pioneers are embattled in a costly legal dispute sounds like justice to me.
And the fact that some news websites continue to allow such spammy pop-under ads to be served to their readers shows just how low some companies will go to make a buck. It's cowardly advertising, and people hate it.
In contrast, you'll never see pop-unders hiding beneath this website.
- If the court ruling holds up, the three Vanderhook brothers stand to
become wealthy Internet entrepreneurs.
- But they wonder if they'll recover the innocence they say they lost in
the rough-and-tumble world of big business.
- Two weeks ago a Superior Court jury in Santa Ana ordered X-10 Wireless
Technology of Seattle to pay the Vanderhooks $4.3 million in damages.
- X10 attorney Sean P. O'Connor would not comment on the damage award or
possibility of an appeal.
- "When we found out they weren't paying that bill, we were beyond
distraught," recalled Chris Vanderhook.
- "All of a sudden, it stops being a game when it's real money and real
dollar figures and real employees depending on us for their jobs," said
his brother Russell.
All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml