You’ve probably been thinking to yourself, “Something doesn’t add up” about the Parkland, Florida school shooting. It’s becoming increasingly obvious to every intelligent observer that someone wanted to maximize the body count from the shooting. Consider the irrefutable evidence that’s been widely reported across the media:
#1) Deputy Scot Peterson stood by and refused to enter the school building even though he was armed and on-site during the entire shooting rampage. This is not in dispute.
#2) In all, four sheriff’s deputies stood down, hiding behind their cars and refusing to enter the building, according to numerous media reports including CNN’s own Jake Tapper.
#3) Their boss, Sheriff Scott Israel, is a known anti-gun Democrat who has been accused of public corruption for spending hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxpayer money to conduct “positive spin” P.R. campaigns to make himself look good. He also compares himself to Ghandi, Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King, Jr.
#4) Even the Coral Springs police who rushed to the scene (and rushed into the building) accused the Broward County sheriff’s deputies of “dereliction of duty.” This was reported by CNN and dozens of other sources.
Now, we learn that emergency responders were ordered to delay entering the building as students bled out, adding to the casualties.
As reported by Brian Entin from Fox Affiliate WSVN in Miami, emergency responders were orders to stand down, delaying their entry into the school building while students were bleeding out.
An emergency responder told Entin, “We were asking to go in… why are we all standing around? …law enforcement… would not allow medical personnel in…” (see full response in tweet, below):
"Everything I was trained on mass casualty events says they did the wrong thing." I spoke with a seasoned emergency medical responder who was one of the first to the Stoneman shooting. He doesn't want me using his name for fear he will get fired. Here are his exact quotes. @wsvn pic.twitter.com/t9trsOEaek
— Brian Entin (@BrianEntin) February 24, 2018
“The responder also reportedly told Entin that medical teams were willing to risk their lives to go inside and were asking their scene commander why they were standing around,” Fox News reported today. From Fox News:
The responder added, “I would hypothesize I could have saved lives. I can’t say for sure.”
Three high-ranking sources including a fire official told Fox News the responder who spoke to Entin could be accurate.
“The WSVN report is correct,” one source said.
“The WSVN report does not shock me given what I’ve found out,” said the fire official.
The allegations of a delayed EMS response came as Florida Gov. Rick Scott launched an investigation into the Broward County Sheriff’s office response on the day of the shooting and how the emergency was handled in its entirety.
What’s clear from not just the tragic event itself but also the highly charged, heavily politicized aftermath of the tragedy (as pursued by fake news theater production companies like CNN) is that everybody was being ordered to stand down. When help was needed most, in other words, somebody was ordering all these officials to DO NOTHING.
Why do you think this could be? Why is almost no one in the media covering this stunning realization? How come no one is asking why the very people we depend on to arrive on the scene of an active shooter and engage bad guys with guns were caught standing around with their guns in their holsters rather than taking out the shooter? (As a side note, this once again underscores the whole reason why dialing 911 is tantamount to suicide, proving why we need the Second Amendment to defend ourselves from bad guys that the government refuses to engage…)
Dare I ask: What’s the point of having law enforcement and EMTs respond to a shooting if they aren’t allowed to enter the building and get something done? More importantly, who told all these people to stand down?
None of their actions make sense if you think the goal was saving lives and preventing casualties. In other words, if you believe the “powers that be” are interested in stopping school shootings and ending all violence against children, you’ll be utterly confused and befuddled when trying to explain the stand down orders. But the moment you flip the script and ask yourself “who benefits from school shootings?” suddenly it all makes sense. It becomes immediately clear that this violence was allowed to be carried out — deliberately and maliciously — in order to maximize the body count for political gain. (Yes, there’s nothing Democrats won’t do to demonize their political opponents…)
Yep, I said it: Democrats are happy to sacrifice a certain number of children in pursuit of their political goals of demonizing the GOP, the NRA and the Second Amendment.
John Hawkins from PJ Media dared to say much the same thing in an article entitled, “Sure, I’ll Say It: Liberals Don’t Want to Stop School Shootings.” There, Hawkins writes:
Know who else acts as if they love school shootings? Liberals. The liberals you see on TV. The liberals you read on Twitter. The liberals writing columns. What else can you think after watching the way liberals behave after mass shootings with large body counts? It’s the same thing every time.
…let me suggest something that you are not supposed to say: liberals don’t want to try any of these other things primarily BECAUSE THEY MIGHT WORK and reduce the number of school shootings. You’d think everyone would want fewer school shootings because it would mean fewer dead kids, but it would also mean that liberals would lose a useful tool for pushing the gun control agenda, and that appears to mean more to liberals than the lives of children.
Everywhere you turn in the media right now, you’ll see Democrats arguing against school security measures. The very same people who support guards at banks, guards on airplanes and guards at sporting events are somehow completely opposed to having someone guard their own children. They know that “gun-free zones” are mass shooting magnets. They know that 98% of mass shootings take place in these so-called “gun-free zones,” yet they continue to oppose school security measures that would save the lives of their own children. Ever wonder why?
Hawkins is elucidating an idea that’s becoming increasingly obvious to every intelligent observer of all this: If the goal were to actually stop school shootings, then armed law enforcement would have rushed into the building and engaged the shooter (at the very least with nuisance fire to pin him down and interrupt his movement). I’m trained in tactical handgun combat, and I can assure you that unloading a few rounds on the bad guy — even if you don’t score direct hits — would sharply interfere with his rampage and almost certainly cause him to lose focus and mobility.
There isn’t a sheriff’s deputy in America who hasn’t received some level of training on how to handle school shootings. “Active shooter” scenarios are, in fact, the highest priority training they receive these days. In every case, without exception, deputies and cops are trained to engage the active shooter.
There are no exceptions to this training. I happen to know lots of cops and deputies. They are all trained in this. I can assure you there likely isn’t a sheriff’s deputy anywhere in America who, left to his own decision, wouldn’t engage an active school shooter with at least some sort of return fire. There is only one situation in which deputies would fail to engage bad guys, and that’s if they are ordered to stand down.
Again, somebody ordered these officers to stand down. And then somebody ordered the EMTs to back off. The body count was thus made worse than it should have been. But why was this allowed to happen?
And now, here’s where things start to go down the rabbit hole. A teacher named Stacy Lippel appeared on ABC’s Good Morning America, where she described her direct encounter with the shooter. She’s a teacher at the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, of course, and YouTube has been busy scrubbing this video off all channels to make sure you don’t see it. Watch the video below while you still can. Efforts are under way to memory hole this video interview from the ‘net.
In this video, she says the following:
I suddenly saw the shooter about 20 feet from me standing at the end of the hallway actively shooting down the hallway. Just a barrage of bullets. And I’m staring at him thinking ‘why is the police here?’ This is strange because he’s in full metal garb. Helmet, face-mask, bulletproof armor, shooting this rifle that I’ve never seen before.
Notice that she immediately recognizes him as a police officer, wearing police gear. She specifically names the helmet, face mask and bulletproof armor. None of this gear was worn by Nikolas Cruz, according to all the media reports, photos and videos of his arrest. Stacy did not describe the shooter as a “student.”
In other words, this teacher is not describing Nikolas Cruz. She’s describing an armed, masked, geared-up person doing the shooting. Now are you beginning to understand why the sheriff’s deputies were ordered to stay outside the building?
As Mac Slavo reports from SHTFplan.com, there’s another witness whose testimony is being rapidly scrubbed from the internet by YouTube, Facebook and Twitter, all of which are now actively engaged in a massive conspiracy cover-up. Here’s how Slavo reports it:
Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School student Alexa says she passed school shooting suspect Nikolas Cruz immediately after the shooting and had a brief exchange with him. She also said there was, for certain, more than one shooter.
Both of these eyewitness accounts fly in the face of the official narrative the mainstream media is expecting us to digest. By now, it’s evident that the media has an agenda and is working hand in hand with globalists to disarm the good American people with phony narratives and false flag attacks that become immediately about the loss of rights instead of about the gaping holes in their own story.
“The shots were coming from the other part of the building,” Alexa says, after explaining she was literally walking down the hallway, chatting with Nikolas Cruz, after the shooting had begun.
If the following video appears blank, that’s because YouTube is rapidly deleting all these videos in order to cover up all evidence that contradicts the official (fake) narrative. Watch it while you still can:
What to make of all this?
If you’re reading this website, you’re smart enough to know the real answer. The dumbed-down masses refuse to “go there” because they don’t believe there’s evil in the world. They can’t imagine anyone plotting such a heinous crime because they don’t think human beings are capable of such evil.
That’s why those same people think Hillary Clinton is a saint, by the way. And they think Jimmy Kimmel is a comedian rather than a hate propagandist. But those who have lived long enough to really witness the Democrats at work — with all their murders of Seth Rich, Vince Foster, Andrew Breitbart and dozens of others — know exactly what the Dems are capable of. The honest answer is that they’re “capable of anything” that will gain them political power and control over the next election.
In fact, 17 deaths is small time for these people. If you really want to go down the rabbit hole, take a closer look at the Bill Clinton regime, the Oklahoma City bombing, and how that was deployed against a government building with a children’s day care center in order to generate dead bodies of little children for the TV cameras. That event was used by Clinton to lay blame on Rush Limbaugh, “talk radio,” the NRA and gun owners. It was a key event in the run-up to the 1994 assault weapons ban that was step one toward nationwide gun confiscation. (That ban expired in 2004, by the way.)
As with all such mass killings, the “official story” is complete nonsense. It’s all shaped for a particular narrative that always leads back to gun confiscation, the demonization of conservatives and the desperate attempts of Democrats to gain political power. There would be almost no mass killings in America if powerful, deep state operatives weren’t actively carrying them out, in other words.
Watch this video to learn more: