NIH stalling on release of Fauci documents, keeping taxpayers in darkness
By Ethan Huff // Apr 06, 2022

Transparency advocate Adam Andrzejewski, CEO and founder of, said that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is trying to keep hidden from the public damning information about Tony Fauci, including his bloated salary as one of the highest and most overpaid parasites in America's government.


"There is a multi-layered strategy, funded by taxpayers, to keep taxpayers in the dark about how NIH is spending taxpayer money," Andrzejewski is quoted as saying to Epoch TV's "American Thought Leaders." discovered that Fauci received a permanent pay bump in the early 2000s as part of an alleged plan to prevent him from leaving the government. Prior to that, Fauci appears to have been creating AIDS bioweapons since infecting people with deadly diseases is apparently his specialty.

On Jan. 28, 2021, filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to learn more about Fauci's dirty history, including what he supposedly does at the government, as well as disclosure documents and other papers. In response, the NIH produced 51 pages of records but did not provide any additional documents.

The NIH also failed to produce records in response to two other requests from the group for documents related to Fauci, according to a lawsuit that was filed in federal court.

"They're not complying with open records law," Andrzejewski said, adding that dozens of other groups have also filed lawsuits because of this.

Andrzejewski was removed as a Forbes contributor for reporting on Fauci

U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta, an Obama appointee, has ordered the parties to try to work out a solution on their own. The NIH has also agreed to produce about 300 pages per month, however Andrzejewski said that "virtually nothing of value" is contained within any of them, in many cases because they are mostly redacted.

If the NIH is allowed to redact the very information being requested, then what good is that information? The answer is that it is no good, and that is precisely what Andrzejewski aims to draw attention to with this process.

Andrzejewski used to contribute to Forbes but was removed because of his reporting on Fauci, which exposed the weasel for some of his crimes against humanity. Andrzejewski wrote that he expected to see waivers for conflicts of interest, including a waiver regarding Fauci's wife Christine Grady because she is the current chief bioethics official at the NIH.

"We shouldn't be having to engage in expensive litigation to open the books on Dr. Anthony Fauci or even to call for a nice repository of all the ethical studies from his wife, Christine Grady," Andrzejewski said, noting that all requested documents "should be immediately released by the NIH."

"All of this should be opened up. And this has public policy implications. If the Republicans take control of the House, there is going to be endless oversight investigations of this entire COVID-19 response, with Dr. Fauci at the nexus of that hurricane. And so right now, they should get out in front of all of it and just open the books on everything, so the politicians, the pundits, the media, the people, so we can see how the sausage was made from A to Z."

There is no question that Fauci is up to his ears in crime, and that is why the NIH refuses to honor these requests in accordance to the law. At some point, however, he will have to pay the piper, and may that day come soon.

"So what???" asked a skeptical commenter at the Epoch Times about all of this. "Nothing is going to be done about it."

The latest news about Fauci can be found at

Sources include:

Related News
Take Action:
Support NewsTarget by linking to this article from your website.
Permalink to this article:
Embed article link:
Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use is permitted with credit to (including a clickable link).
Please contact us for more information.
Free Email Alerts
Get independent news alerts on natural cures, food lab tests, cannabis medicine, science, robotics, drones, privacy and more. © 2022 All Rights Reserved. All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published on this site. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.

This site uses cookies
News Target uses cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using this site, you agree to our privacy policy.
Learn More
Get 100% real, uncensored news delivered straight to your inbox
You can unsubscribe at any time. Your email privacy is completely protected.