On Friday, Oct. 7, Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo announced that the Sunshine State no longer recommends mRNA COVID-19 vaccines for men between the ages of 18 and 39.
Ladapo said this announcement was made following an investigation conducted by the Florida Department of Health that was carried out using techniques for evaluating vaccine safety.
"This analysis found that there is an 84 percent increase in the relative incidence of cardiac-related death among males 18 to 39 years old within 28 days following mRNA vaccination," Ladapo said in a statement. "With a high level of global immunity to COVID-19, the benefit of vaccination is likely outweighed by this abnormally high risk of cardiac-related death among men in this age group." (Related: Newly released CDC data shows nearly a third of people who got vaccinated experienced significant adverse events.)
"As such, the State Surgeon General recommends against males aged 18 to 39 from receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccines," the statement concluded. "Those with preexisting cardiac conditions, such as myocarditis and pericarditis, should take particular caution when making this decision."
Armstrong said this official statement from a state-level government agency should not be ignored, but mainstream media outlets and public health agencies will still try to do so.
"Eighty-four percent increase in death. That's the warning from the surgeon general of Florida, and they're gonna try to censor that. But I thought, when it's the government giving out data, that's it. You have to obey that. It's the be-all-end-all," said Armstrong, commenting on the hypocrisy that will come from mainstream news sources reacting to the Florida surgeon general's announcement.
The second victory against the COVID-19 vaccines, Armstrong noted, is attorney Thomas Renz's lawsuit against EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill researcher Ralph Baric.
Renz named Daszak and Baric specifically as defendants because they are primarily responsible for the deaths of his plaintiffs due to their involvement in funding gain-of-function research on SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Renz is representing the estates of two people who died due to COVID-19. He filed the case on Oct. 5 in the Supreme Court of New York.
The lawsuit alleged that Daszak and Baric conspired to circumvent restrictions on funding gain-of-function research, and transferred both money and technology to Wuhan Institute of Virology researcher Dr. Zheng Li, known as the "Bat Lady" for her extensive research on bat-borne viruses. It was this act that led to the coronavirus being weaponized and released upon the world.
In addition to being responsible for the deaths of the plaintiffs, Renz further charges Daszak and Baric for negligent failure to warn, breach of warranty, negligent infliction of emotional distress, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence, gross negligence, assault and battery, medical monitoring and fear of contracting illness and wrongful death.
"Foreign countries can't ignore this. They're gonna look at this and say, 'Oh my gosh, what the heck did America do?' That's what's gonna happen, guaranteed," he said.
Watch this episode of "The Ben Armstrong Show" as Ben Armstrong discusses the latest victories against the COVID-19 vaccines.