More than 1,600 scientists – 1,609 as of this writing, to be precise – belonging to the Global Climate Intelligence Group (CLINTEL) signed the World Climate Declaration in August, declaring that man-made climate change is a myth.
Contrary to the leftist narrative, there is no "climate emergency," which means there is no need to abandon earth-based "fossil" fuels like gas and oil in favor of loud and unsightly wind turbines and Chinese-made solar panels.
"There is no climate emergency," CLINTEL says.
"Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures."
(Related: The climate crazies are begging Biden to declare a "climate emergency" so he can instantly become dictator of America [which in many ways he already is].)
For as long as the earth has existed, the climate has always been changing, this cohort of scientists and other experts says. Sometimes it gets cold, while other times it gets hot – and taking away meat, cars, and freedom is never going to change that.
As recently as 1850, the earth went through a "Little Ice Age," so it is "no surprise," the declaration states, "that we now are experiencing a period of warming."
The government and media love to make much ado about nothing concerning the changing climate. All that "global warming" they love to rant on and on about is actually not that bad.
"Warming is happening 'far slower' than predicted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change," wrote Naveen Athrappully in a report for The Epoch Times.
As we have been saying for quite some time now, CO2 and other greenhouse gases are good for the planet. CO2 in particular is "essential" to all life on earth, and is extremely "favorable" for nature and the actual greening of the planet.
"Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as policy tools," the coalition warns, adding that these same models "exaggerate the effect of greenhouse gases" and "ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial."
Though they repeatedly try to denigrate it as a pollutant, the climate cultists are getting it wrong, wrong, and more wrong every time they refer to CO2 as some kind of planetary scourge that must be removed if we are to have any chance at survival.
"Extra CO2 results in the growth of global plant biomass while also boosting the yields of crops worldwide," further explains Athrappully.
Furthermore, there is "no statistical evidence" to even remotely suggest that CO2 is in any way responsible for fueling more natural disasters like hurricanes, droughts, and floods.
"There is no climate emergency," the group says. "Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050. Go for adaptation instead of mitigation; adaptation works whatever the causes are."
"To believe the outcome of a climate model is to believe what the model makers have put in. This is precisely the problem of today's climate discussion to which climate models are central. Climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, not on sound self-critical science. Should not we free ourselves from the naïve belief in immature climate models?"
The latest news about climate fanaticism and the threat it poses to freedom and liberty can be found at Climate.news.
Sources for this article include: