- Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado awarded Nobel Peace Prize, dedicates honor to Trump for supporting democracy in Venezuela.
- CAIR demands Machado renounce ties to Netanyahu’s Likud Party and far-right European figures or face revocation of the prize.
- Machado praises Trump’s sanctions and naval deployments against Maduro’s regime, calling it a “narco-terrorist criminal enterprise.”
- Critics accuse Machado of hypocrisy, citing her alignment with anti-immigrant, far-right factions in Europe.
- Trump’s aggressive Venezuela policy marks a stark contrast to Biden’s approach, raising geopolitical stakes in Latin America.
On Friday, October 10, Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for her years-long fight against Nicolás Maduro’s authoritarian regime. In a move that ignited immediate controversy, she dedicated the prize to former U.S. President Donald Trump, crediting his hardline policies for weakening Maduro’s grip on power. But the celebration was short-lived. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) condemned the decision, citing Machado’s alliances with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud Party and European far-right figures like Geert Wilders and Marine Le Pen.
The Nobel Committee’s selection has reignited debates over the moral credibility of the prize, with critics accusing Machado of advocating democracy at home while endorsing exclusionary ideologies abroad. Meanwhile, Trump’s supporters hailed the recognition as validation of his aggressive stance against socialist regimes in Latin America.
Machado’s ties to the far-right
Machado’s political record has long drawn scrutiny. In 2020, she formalized an alliance between her party and Netanyahu’s Likud, vowing to move Venezuela’s embassy to Jerusalem if elected. Earlier this year, she appeared virtually at the Patriots of Europe conference in Madrid, where speakers, including Hungary’s Viktor Orbán, called for a modern-day “Reconquista”—a term evoking the medieval expulsion of Muslims and Jews from Spain.
CAIR’s statement emphasized the dissonance: “The Nobel Peace Prize should go to individuals who have shown moral consistency by bravely advocating justice for all people, not to politicians who demand democracy in their own nation while supporting racism, bigotry and fascism abroad.” Machado has not yet responded to the demand to renounce these affiliations.
Trump’s Venezuela strategy: Sanctions, siege and $50M bounties
Machado’s tribute to Trump underscores his unrelenting pressure on Caracas. Since returning to office, Trump has:
- Deployed U.S. Navy ships to intercept drug cartels linked to Maduro.
- Reimposed oil sanctions lifted under Biden, starving the regime of revenue.
- Offered a $50 million bounty for Maduro’s arrest—the largest in U.S. history.
“President Trump treated this as what it is—a criminal network tied to drug cartels, terrorist groups and foreign regimes that threaten both the Venezuelan people and the security of the United States,” Machado told The Post from hiding. She described Venezuela’s collapse under Maduro: schools shuttered, hospitals without medicine and 90% living in poverty.
Global implications: A hemisphere without socialism?
Machado framed her Nobel as a turning point, predicting Maduro’s fall would trigger the collapse of Cuba and Nicaragua’s regimes. “For the first time in history, we will have the Americas free of communism, dictatorship and narco-terrorism. And that will be President Trump’s legacy” she declared. The claim aligns with Trump’s broader vision of a Monroe Doctrine revival, positioning U.S. power as a bulwark against leftist governments.
Yet critics warn that Machado’s far-right associations undermine her democratic credentials. Her praise for Trump’s policies—seen by some as destabilizing—further polarizes the narrative.
A prize dividing the world
The Nobel Committee’s selection of Machado has become a geopolitical Rorschach test. To supporters, it validates Trump’s aggressive anti-authoritarianism. To detractors, it rewards a leader whose alliances contradict the prize’s ideals. As CAIR’s challenge looms, the controversy underscores a deeper question: Can the Nobel Peace Prize retain its moral authority in an era of ideological battlegrounds?
For now, Machado’s dedication to Trump ensures one certainty: The award will be as contentious as the conflicts it seeks to resolve. In honoring Machado, the Nobel Committee didn’t just crown a dissident—it waded into the fray of America’s culture wars and the global right’s rising influence. The fallout may redefine what “peace” truly means.
Sources for this article include:
Please contact us for more information.