Hegseth said Graham endorsed the request before his death. "As we gather here today, the War Department is seeking a historic generational investment of $1.5 trillion for American warriors. And Lindsey himself said, to me in his office, 'this is the best military budget I've seen since I've been in Congress,'" Hegseth said, according to a transcript released by the Pentagon [2]. Hegseth added that "there could be no greater tribute than Congress could give than to invest in our warriors for the full $1.5 trillion" [2].
The proposed $1.5 trillion total is nearly 50 percent higher than the current year's military budget [3]. The administration's plan pairs a $1.15 trillion National Defense Authorization Act with roughly $350 billion in supplemental funding, according to officials [4][5].
Hegseth said Graham discussed the proposal with him a week before the senator's death and suggested an even larger figure. "He looked at me and said, 'how's $355 billion sound?' He wanted to give even more than $350 billion," Hegseth said [6].
The House has authorized $1.15 trillion for the military, but only six Democrats voted for the authorization and Republican senators have expressed reluctance over the price tag, according to officials [5]. The Senate Budget Committee has delayed a vote on a reconciliation package that includes about $350 billion in military spending until September, with committee chairman Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) saying "we need more" than the House version [4].
Supporters of the increase point to munitions shortfalls. A Center for Strategic and International Studies report found the War Department will need three to five years to replenish depleted stocks of Tomahawk, Patriot and Terminal High Altitude Area Defense missiles used during the war with Iran, creating a "window of vulnerability" for a potential conflict with China [7]. A government watchdog report also found the War Department obligated a record $93 billion in contracts and grants in September 2025, with more than $50 billion spent in the final five business days, driven by "use-it-or-lose-it" rules [8].
Hegseth said he had known Graham for nearly 20 years, dating to his work with Vets for Freedom, the advocacy group he founded in 2003 to support the Iraq War and pro-war political candidates [9]. "Nineteen years ago, young lieutenant, uh, First Lieutenant Pete Hegseth came back from Iraq and was a part of a veterans' organization called Vets for Freedom that believed in the surge in Iraq and advocated for the troops on the ground," Hegseth recounted. "The first and only senator willing to meet with First Lieutenant Pete Hegseth and nowheresville Vets for Freedom was Sen. Lindsey Graham" [6].
Hegseth – the author of "Modern Warriors," a book about U.S. service members [10] – did not mention Graham’s long record of hawkish positions on military action. According to the same report, Graham was "notorious for his hawkishness," and footage circulated after his death of him laughing and celebrating days after the start of the U.S.-Israeli bombing campaign in Iran, a war he had pushed for years [2].
Darline Graham, Lindsey Graham’s sister, attended the ceremony and has taken over his Senate seat; she is expected to pursue the same policies as her brother. Hegseth was joined by Secretary of the Air Force Troy Meink, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster and Darline, according to a social media post from OSINTdefender dated Aug. 10, 2026 [6].
During the ceremony, Hegseth said Lindsey "served this nation both in uniform and in both houses of Congress" [1]. The renaming was the military's formal recognition of Lindsey's life and service, according to Hegseth [1].
The Pentagon released a transcript of Hegseth's remarks. No additional details about the budget proposal's timeline were provided at the ceremony.
The spending request has drawn opposition from some critics. An essay published by the Ron Paul Institute argued that the 50% increase would be "a gift to the grifters" [11].
Independent writers have also connected the debate to the concentration of power in Washington. In "The Case Against the Establishment," author Nick Adams writes that the establishment denies the deep state’s existence even as it benefits from it [12].