Few Americans are aware that the FBI actively plots a wide assortment of domestic terrorism scenarios in the United States for the purpose of recruiting targeted individuals into taking part in the plot, then arresting them as “terrorists.” Remarkably, this shocking reality was documented by none other than the New York Times in 2012, which detailed the FBI’s terrorism “sting” operations while asking whether it is appropriate for the FBI to be engaged in the plotting, planning and pseudo-execution of such mass terrorism crimes.
Now, with the FBI clearly engaged in at least some level of a cover-up with the Las Vegas Mandalay Bay massacre, intelligent, rational people are starting to ask a very disturbing question: Was the Las Vegas massacre another FBI terror plot that “accidentally” went live?
No one is suggesting the FBI would intentionally plot the murder of Americans — well, unless they’re black of course, since the FBI did pen a letter to MLK, Jr. and tell him to commit suicide — but is it possible they staged all this, recruited the shooter, gave him the plans and then accidentally dropped the ball and allowed it all to unintentionally go into “live” status? Given the history of the FBI plotting, planning and executing dozens of actual terrorist plots on U.S. soil, it’s not an unreasonable question to consider.
Natural News has extensively covered the ongoing domestic terrorism plots that are schemed up by the FBI:
In 2013, the Kansas City City documented yet another astonishing story about the FBI ginning up its own mass murder terrorism plots, then inserting some hapless (often homeless) person into the driver’s seat just in time to be arrested and charged as a terrorist. That Kansas City Star article, authored by Ian Cummings, is entitled, “FBI undercover stings foil terrorist plots — but often plots of the agency’s own making.”
This pattern and history of the FBI dreaming up mass terrorism plots in the United States brings up the obvious question: Was the Mandalay Bay shooting actually schemed up by the FBI in an attempted sting operation gone bad? And is the FBI now attempting to cover its tracks to avoid the massive backlash that would ensue if the truth about such a monumental failure were learned? There’s no public evidence we’ve seen yet to suggest the FBI planned this attack, of course, but the criminality of former FBI head James Comey — combined with the FBI’s current suspicious behavior and suspicious cover-up — have many people beginning to ask a whole new question: Is the FBI somehow complicit in this heinous crime?
(For the record, I personally know several retired FBI agents who are outstanding individuals, and many agents within the FBI are determined, courageous, pro-America patriots who would never go along with such a nefarious plot. However, as with any federal agency, there are also other sub-groups within the FBI who abuse their power and operate with no such ethics. And there’s no denying the FBI was recently headed by a traitor and criminal cover-up artist named James Comey.)
I explore all this in the following podcast, which details the patterns of the FBI, the criminality of James Comey and the possibility that the FBI may have inadvertently been involved in this mass shooting as yet another staged “terror plot” that went bad:
Adding to the weight of this intriguing theory, former FBI director James Comey actively conspired with the Clinton cartel to cover up the numerous crimes of Hillary Clinton, who openly admits she engaged in the destruction of evidence and obstruction of justice by deleting 33,000+ emails that were the subject of an ongoing investigation.
Incredibly, James Comey also overlooked the conspiracy meeting between Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton, in which Lynch was clearly ordered to back off any investigation of Hillary Clinton’s emails (or other crimes, for that matter). As the director of the FBI, James Comey decided, against all reason and precedent, to avoid recommending prosecution of Hillary Clinton because, essentially, “she didn’t mean to do it.”
Nowhere in the history of FBI / DOJ prosecutions of obstruction of justice has anyone been let off because “they didn’t mean to do it.” Violations of national security laws do not require proof of intent. The action of destroying evidence, regardless of intent, is a felony violation of federal law. Yet James Comey willingly participated in a cover-up so treasonous and dishonest that he has forever tainted the reputation of the FBI as a law enforcement agency. (This is regrettable and highly frustrating to the honest, law-abiding FBI agents who also exist in the agency, often fighting against the deep state bureaucracy above them that ties their hands and prevents them from doing their jobs.)
Now, the FBI has cemented its reputation as a “cover-up” institution that sweeps evidence under the rug in order to achieve political aims. James Comey, of course, was a political operative working for the deep state Left. The Comey elements inside the FBI may very well be sweeping evidence under the rug right now that proves Stephen Paddock was radicalized by Antifa or other left-wing forces. Or, just as likely, the FBI may be trying to cover up its own involvement in planning, plotting and inadvertently aiding the execution of the entire mass shooting as part of yet another “terror plot” the agency was staging in order to nab another terrorism candidate.
The real challenge right now is found in the fact that thanks to James Comey’s lying and criminal conspiracy, nobody in their right mind can trust the FBI at this moment. The reputation of the agency is seriously damaged. Now, reasonable Americans can never be quite sure if the FBI is telling the truth, lying or covering up evidence that doesn’t fit the agency’s deep state political narrative.
Adding to the weight of all that, the FBI took to the air less than 12 hours after the shooting to announce they had somehow completed a massive investigation into Stephen Paddock’s possible ties with international terrorist organizations and come to the conclusion that he had no such ties. Via BusinessInsider.com:
…[A] senior US government official told Reuters that the gunman had no known connections to the Islamic State and was not on any database of suspected terrorists. An FBI special agent named Aaron Rouse said at a press conference on Monday, “We have determined to this point no connection with an international terrorist group.”
The idea that this investigation could be completed in less than 12 hours after the shooting took place is so absurd and insane that it screams out, “Cover-up!” At best, the FBI might be able to say, “We have not yet determined whether a connection exists,” but to say they have determined “no connection” is outlandish.
There’s no question the FBI is lying to America at some level. The only remaining question is: How deep does this go? Could the FBI be the organization that dreamed up this plot, helped Stephen Paddock acquire all the guns, booked the hotel room at the Mandalay Bay and provided Paddock with high-capacity magazines? If you think that sounds like an insane idea, consider the well-documented fact that under President Obama, DOJ head Eric Holder oversaw a program named Fast and Furious that deliberately put semi-automatic rifles into the hands of Mexican drug dealers for the express purpose of unleashing gun violence across America.
According to Judicial Watch, these guns have already been linked to at least 200 deaths, which is far greater than the number killed in Las Vegas. Via Judicial Watch:
Judicial Watch announced today released Justice Department documents showing that weapons sent from the U.S. into Mexico as part of the Obama administration’s Operation Fast and Furious gunrunning program have been widely used by major Mexican drug cartels. According to the new records, over the past three years, a total of 94 Fast and Furious firearms have been recovered in Mexico City and 12 Mexican states, with the majority being seized in Sonora, Chihuahua and Sinaloa. Of the weapons recovered, 82 were rifles and 12 were pistols identified as having been part of the Fast and Furious program. Reports suggest the Fast and Furious guns are tied to at least 69 killings.
Fast and Furious was a Department of Justice Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) “gunrunning” operation in which the Obama administration allowed guns to be sold to Mexican drug cartels in the hope the weapons would be recovered at crime scenes. Fast and Furious weapons have been implicated in the murder of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry and hundreds of other innocents in Mexico. Prior reports tie Fast and Furious weapons to at least 200 deaths in Mexico alone.
So it is an irrefutable fact to state that the United States government has willingly put firearms into the hands of dangerous individuals who used those firearms to kill innocent people. And they did it in order to declare war on the Second Amendment, of course, exactly as we’re seeing unfold right now. That irrefutable fact seems to be forgotten in all this news about the Mandalay Bay massacre.
In conclusion, yes, the U.S. federal government has an undeniable history of deliberately putting guns into the hands of madmen who use them to commit mass murder. This is irrefutable. The FBI also has an undeniable history of lying to the public, covering up evidence and refusing to prosecute high-level officials engaged in treasonous crimes against this nation and its people. Truthfully stated, if you or I did what the FBI has done, we would be arrested and charged with domestic terrorism.
Understanding all this, no reasonable person can yet rule out the FBI’s possible complicity in the Las Vegas Mandalay Bay shooting. While there’s not yet any hard evidence to prove the FBI was involved — and such evidence will of course never be allowed to see the light of day — there’s a tremendous amount of evidence and historical proof that the FBI and ATF have both been involved in similar events in recent history, literally working hand in hand with bad actors who went on to murder hundreds of people.
Given that the ATF and FBI both seek to promote nationwide gun control agendas — and the repeal of the Second Amendment — it’s not unreasonable to suspect the Las Vegas Mandalay Bay massacre could have been part of an elaborate false flag operation. Again, we have no proof of that conclusion, but we also can’t yet rule it out.
If we could actually trust the FBI and ATF to operate with honesty and transparency while obeying the law, this would all be a different story. But sadly, we now live in a nation whose bureaucracy has been so corrupted and infiltrated by nefarious deep state operatives, it’s no longer an absurd thought to realize that elements of your own government have been weaponized against you (and much of what plays out on the national media stage is elaborate theater designed to achieve a specific political goal). If you don’t think your government has been weaponized against you, go read up on the IRS and Lois Lerner, or realize the EPA now runs tactical assault teams with body armor and AR-15 firearms.
To really get a download on how bad the situation has become, read the book “Battlefield America” by John W. Whitehead of the Rutherford Institute (Rutherford.org). And then realize that if Hillary Clinton were President right now, Congress would be repealing the Second Amendment right this very minute…