04/16/2018 / By JD Heyes
In the mid-1990s, the Republican-led Congress and President Bill Clinton worked together to pass a significant welfare reform program that was dubbed “Workfare.”
Known formally as the “Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act,” it essentially required anyone receiving welfare benefits to find work and take a job in order to keep getting assistance.
Not only that, the assistance was time-limited; the goal of the law was to move people off welfare completely and into the workforce.
“The law contains strong work requirements, a performance bonus to reward states for moving welfare recipients into jobs, state maintenance of effort requirements, comprehensive child support enforcement, and supports for families moving from welfare to work — including increased funding for child care and guaranteed medical coverage,” said a description by the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversaw its requirements.
Left-wing Democrats and their media mouthpieces hated the law and nitpicked it incessantly because they view dependency on government as an electoral strength.
But by any measure of Workfare’s true intent — transforming formerly reliant Americans into citizens independent of government — the law was a success. As the Heritage Foundation noted in 2012, Workfare reduced welfare caseloads by half as employment rates among welfare recipients “soared.”
When Barack Obama took office, however, he gutted the law’s work requirement by exempting states from the law’s work requirements. As Robert Rector, a senior research fellow at Heritage’s domestic policy studies department, noted in 2012 in The Washington Post, “the Obama administration has jettisoned the law’s work requirements, asserting that, in the future, no state will be required to follow them. In place of the legislated work requirements, the administration has stated, it will unilaterally design its own “work” systems without congressional involvement or consent. Any state will be free to follow the new Obama requirements ‘in lieu of’ the written statute.”
The Left attacked Rector as being wrong and intentionally so. He wasn’t; after all, he helped craft the 1996 Workfare legislation.
As a result of Obama’s change in the statute, welfare rolls spiked upward again, which was totally predictable. From 2009-2012, CNS News reported, federal and state welfare assistance had grown by nearly 20 percent, approaching $1 trillion annually for all 79 means-tested programs. (Related: Disgusting: Welfare recipients may soon shop online for clothes using your tax dollars.)
By 2016, there was a 32-percent jump in welfare recipients, Breitbart News reported.
Slowly but surely, after President Donald J. Trump took office, a number of states began to reimpose work requirements. Fox News noted on Independence Day in 2017 that in states that had done so, welfare rolls fell dramatically, between 50-90 percent, saving states and the federal government tens of billions of dollars.
The evidence is clear: Workfare requirements empower individuals, reduce welfare participation, and cut costs. Now, the president just put this transformation into hyperdrive.
Earlier this week Trump signed an executive order reinstating the work requirement. The order, titled, “Reducing Poverty in America by Promoting Opportunity and Economic Mobility,” will affect millions of people currently receiving taxpayer-supported assistance for programs including Medicaid, SNAP (a.k.a. food stamps), and public housing.
As reported by The Western Journal:
The federal government spent more than $700 billion on welfare programs to assist low-income households last year. The president says his latest executive order is designed to make more public assistance recipients self-sufficient.
“The federal government’s role is to clear paths to self-sufficiency, reserving public assistance programs for those who are truly in need,” says the order. “The federal government should do everything within its authority to empower individuals by providing opportunities for work, including by investing in federal programs that are effective at moving people into the workforce and out of poverty.”
Importantly, the order also returns Tenth Amendment authority to states, permitting them to decide how best to utilize public assistance dollars.
Out of earshot of the daily noise of special counsel probes, angry protests, and political shenanigans, Trump is quietly, steadily keeping his pledge to “Make America Great Again.”
See more information like this at BigGovernment.news.
J.D. Heyes is editor of The National Sentinel and a senior writer for Natural News and News Target.
Tagged Under: bill clinton, dependency, entitlements, executive order, gutting, Obama Administration, President Donald Trump, President Trump, reinstatement, spending power, states, unemployment, welfare, welfare recipients, welfare to work, White House, work requirement, Workfare