Texas Dem pushing legislation to make it a ‘hate crime’ for white people to criticize minorities
By JD Heyes // Jan 18, 2023

Once again, a black Democrat is proving that she and her party are among the most racist people in the country and is hellbent on tearing away what is left of the fabric of our society as evidenced by an outrageous, disgusting -- and patently unconstitutional -- piece of legislation she has just introduced.

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, a Texas Democrat who represents one of the most racially gerrymandered districts in the country, does not believe white Americans deserve the full guarantees and protections of the First Amendment.

Lee has introduced legislation called the “Leading Against White Supremacy Act of 2023? which would make it a federal “hate crime” for whites “to question open-borders immigration, advocate for preserving America’s culture and traditional demographic make-up or even criticize minorities,” according to the National File.

The outlet noted further:

Like in far-left European nations, that have turned their federal law enforcement apparatus against their own native-born citizens, under Jackson Lee’s legislation, merely posting online about the decline of American culture, at the hands of open borders immigration, could land a white person in federal prison.

“A person engages in a white supremacy [sic] inspired hate crime when white supremacy ideology has motivated the planning, development, preparation, or perpetration of actions that constituted a crime or were undertaken in furtherance of activity that, if effectuated, would have constituted a crime,” the bill says.

In short, we have another Democrat of color being a massive racist against whites under the phony guise of 'battling racism' and alleged bigotry. How typical.

"Under Jackson Lee’s legislation, if federal investigators determine that the web postings of a third party had “inspire[d]” someone else, even someone they don’t know, to commit a federal hate crime, that person would be arrested, and federally charged with a hate crime of their own," The National File's report continued.

"Specifically, Jackson Lee targets Americans who are in favor of border security, calling out 'replacement theory' by name, an ideology that holds that open borders and mass migration into the Western World are part of a deliberate effort to 'replace' white people in their native lands," the report said, adding:

Human knowledge is under attack! Governments and powerful corporations are using censorship to wipe out humanity's knowledge base about nutrition, herbs, self-reliance, natural immunity, food production, preparedness and much more. We are preserving human knowledge using AI technology while building the infrastructure of human freedom. Use our decentralized, blockchain-based, uncensorable free speech platform at Brighteon.io. Explore our free, downloadable generative AI tools at Brighteon.AI. Support our efforts to build the infrastructure of human freedom by shopping at HealthRangerStore.com, featuring lab-tested, certified organic, non-GMO foods and nutritional solutions.

As the legislation explains, two people could be charged in relation to the same, lone wolf-style attack if, “at least one of [them] published material advancing white supremacy, white supremacist ideology, antagonism based on ‘replacement theory’, or hate speech that vilifies or is otherwise directed against any non-White person or group.” Even if they don’t know each other.

In dissecting the bill, Red State noted further: "The provision is so broad that you could drive a Mack truck through it. What is a 'white supremacy-inspired hate crime' under this statute? How is 'replacement theory' defined? Because what Democrats call 'replacement theory' as a way to silence Republicans is often not replacement theory at all but is just a reiteration of Democrat-admitted aims to use immigration to influence elections."

What's more, use of the word "or" in section B is also notable because it leaves "vilifies" as a lone qualifier, meaning the limiting principle or guideline is not clear at all. "If I post on social media that Shelia Jackson Lee is an incredibly ignorant, abusive person who has a long history of treating her staff like dirt, does that mean I’ve 'vilified' her under this proposed law? It would certainly seem so," Red State's Bonchie noted further.

This woman and so many in her party are blatant, open racists and they obviously have animus towards white people, the majority of Americans. It's a disgrace that the people of her gerrymandered district continue to send her to Congress.

Sources include:

RedState.com

NationalFile.com



Take Action:
Support NewsTarget by linking to this article from your website.
Permalink to this article:
Copy
Embed article link:
Copy
Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use is permitted with credit to NewsTarget.com (including a clickable link).
Please contact us for more information.
Free Email Alerts
Get independent news alerts on natural cures, food lab tests, cannabis medicine, science, robotics, drones, privacy and more.

NewsTarget.com © 2022 All Rights Reserved. All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. NewsTarget.com is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. NewsTarget.com assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published on this site. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.

This site uses cookies
News Target uses cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using this site, you agree to our privacy policy.
Learn More
Close
Get 100% real, uncensored news delivered straight to your inbox
You can unsubscribe at any time. Your email privacy is completely protected.