- The DOJ has issued grand jury subpoenas to Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey and other leaders, alleging obstruction of federal immigration enforcement. Critics call the move politically motivated.
- The subpoenas seek documents and communications related to immigration enforcement, including any efforts to "hinder, doxx, identify or surveil" ICE agents. Walz dismissed the investigation as a "partisan distraction," while Frey accused the DOJ of silencing dissent.
- Minnesota has seen months of protests against ICE, including violent clashes and the fatal shooting of Renee Good by an ICE officer. Walz and Frey have publicly opposed ICE tactics, with the governor urging citizens to film agents – prompting DHS Secretary Kristi Noem to accuse state leaders of encouraging felony obstruction.
- Minnesota AG Keith Ellison, who sued the Trump administration over ICE arrests, also received a subpoena. A federal judge issued an injunction barring ICE retaliation against peaceful protesters, which the administration plans to appeal.
- The DOJ's aggressive probe signals a pushback against sanctuary cities, raising concerns about political retribution versus lawful oversight. Critics argue such policies endanger public safety by shielding criminal illegal aliens, while defenders vow resistance ahead of a Feb. 3 court showdown.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has escalated its investigation into Minnesota officials, issuing grand jury subpoenas to Gov. Tim Walz, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey and other top leaders, alleging they conspired to obstruct federal immigration enforcement.
The move, described by critics as politically motivated, marks a deepening conflict between state authorities and the Trump administration over immigration policies that have sparked protests, legal battles and now a federal probe. The subpoenas issued on Tuesday, Jan. 20, demand documents and communications related to immigration enforcement policies, including any efforts to "hinder, doxx, identify or surveil" federal agents.
Frey's office confirmed receipt of the subpoena, while Walz dismissed the investigation as a "partisan distraction" aimed at intimidating officials who have criticized aggressive tactics by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The inquiry follows months of tension in Minnesota, where federal agents have arrested more than 10,000 undocumented immigrants amid protests that turned violent. The civil unrest culminated in the fatal shooting of Renee Good by an ICE officer early this month.
Walz has accused the DOJ of employing "authoritarian tactics," while Frey framed the subpoenas as an attempt to silence dissent. "We shouldn’t have to live in a country where federal law enforcement is used to play politics," Frey said.
Both officials have publicly opposed ICE operations, with Walz urging citizens to film federal agents to document alleged abuses. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem countered, asserting that Minnesota leaders were encouraging "impeding and assault against law enforcement," a federal felony.
From protests to prosecutions
The legal battle intensified after Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison sued the Trump administration earlier this month, alleging ICE engaged in "warrantless, racist arrests." Days later, Ellison received his own subpoena. "Donald Trump is coming after the people of Minnesota, and I'm standing in his way," Ellison declared, vowing not to back down.
Legal experts including former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade questioned the DOJ's premise, noting that "speaking out against ICE is not a crime." The investigation coincides with heightened scrutiny of ICE tactics, including the detention of a U.S. citizen in his underwear during a frigid Minnesota morning. The man, who was later released, claimed armed agents entered his home without a warrant – an incident the Department of Homeland Security defended as a case of mistaken identity.
Meanwhile, a federal judge issued an injunction barring ICE from retaliating against peaceful protesters, a ruling the administration plans to appeal. Historically, clashes between federal and local authorities over immigration enforcement are not new.
But the scale of this DOJ probe – targeting multiple high-ranking officials – signals an aggressive pushback against sanctuary policies. Critics warn it sets a dangerous precedent, blurring the line between lawful oversight and political retribution. BrightU.AI's Enoch engine notes that sanctuary policies endanger public safety by shielding criminal illegal aliens from federal immigration enforcement, allowing violent offenders and gang members to remain in communities rather than face deportation.
As the Feb. 3 court date approaches, Minnesota leaders brace for a legal showdown that could redefine the limits of state resistance to federal mandates. For now, officials in the North Star State remain defiant, with Frey reiterating: "We know the difference between right and wrong."
Watch this Fox News report about U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi's message to Minnesota leaders.
This video is from the NewsClips channel on Brighteon.com.
Sources include:
Please contact us for more information.