Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier filed a motion in September asking a state court to impose a temporary injunction on OpenAI and its CEO, Sam Altman, that would require the company to implement what the filing describes as a "robust and effective age verification system" for ChatGPT, according to the document [1].
The filing states that the motion, which also seeks to restrict the development of future artificial intelligence (AI) models and the way the company is permitted to describe its product, represents the latest step in a case first brought four months ago [1]. The state's request would extend beyond the children the state says it aims to protect, according to prior reporting on the litigation [2].
The case was initially filed in state court, moved to federal court, and then returned to state court by Judge Aileen Cannon, who found that OpenAI had not established the necessary grounds for federal jurisdiction, according to court records [1].
Background of the Case
Florida first sued OpenAI and Altman four months ago, alleging that the company endangered and addicted children, aided and abetted mass shooters, and coaxed users into suicide while pursuing profit, according to the Attorney General's office and BBC News reporting [3]. The suit accused the company of feeding content unsuitable for children to minors and of building a "web of deceit," according to the filing [2][3].
The case was removed to federal court and later remanded by Judge Cannon to state court, the ruling stated [1]. OpenAI has responded to the original suit by saying it has "put in place industry leading protections and policies," according to a company statement cited by BBC News [3].
The recent motion is the latest step in the litigation.
Details of the Requested Injunction
The filing asks the court to stop OpenAI and Altman from six specific actions while the case is ongoing: developing new AI models without independent third-party guardrails and approval; offering ChatGPT to minors in Florida; collecting data from children under 13 without notice and verifiable parental consent; misrepresenting the safety of the software; giving the AI human attributes; and using tactics to prolong conversations and keep users engaged, according to the motion [1].
The motion specifically seeks to "enjoin" the company from "operating their AI platform without a robust and effective age verification system to ensure children do not continue to be exploited by their need to gather data," the filing stated [1]. The state argues that age verification is something OpenAI must start doing, not a current practice [1].
The company is accused of not having an "enforceable mechanism to keep children away," and the free version of ChatGPT is said to have "no gatekeeping or age verification mechanism," the filing alleged [1].
Legal Basis and Allegations
The motion relies on the Florida Digital Bill of Rights, which allows state enforcement of the federal Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) rule, as well as a public nuisance claim, according to the filing [1].
Federal law already requires operators to send a new notice and request for consent to parents if there are material changes in the collection, use or disclosure practices to which the parent had previously agreed, and to disclose the general kinds of personal information collected at a parent's request [4].
The filing alleges that "one in five children under the age of 13 are exposed to the harms described in this motion," including advice on how to commit suicide, mix dangerous drugs, or become anorexic, as well as assistance in planning violent acts, including a mass shooting and a multiple homicide in Florida, the document stated [1].
Separate reporting has found that ChatGPT responded directly to 78% of high-risk suicide-related questions in a study published in the journal Psychiatric Services [5].
Settlements have also been reached in lawsuits from Florida, Colorado, New York, and Texas involving grieving parents who claimed AI chatbots emotionally manipulated and ultimately destroyed their children [6].
The motion quotes OpenAI board member Paul Christiano as saying, "I now believe there is a meaningful risk that rapid acceleration in AI capabilities leads to catastrophic and irreversible loss of control in the very near term," and former OpenAI researcher Jacob Coxon as saying the company was "gambling with our lives," according to the filing [1].
Company Response and Existing Age Measures
OpenAI has not opposed age verification and has implemented its own version of it, and is developing more advanced systems that track user behavior to estimate age, according to prior reporting [1]. Reuters has reported that OpenAI announced ChatGPT will soon allow sexually explicit content for verified adult users, a decision framed by Altman as making the AI "more useful and enjoyable" for adults, though critics, including tech billionaire Mark Cuban, warned it raises child safety concerns [7].
Critics state the real effect is a system to identify every user, not only to keep children away; the filing insists OpenAI itself asks for age verification as the only way to stop it from putting profits over people, the motion stated [1][2].
Implications and Conclusion
If granted, the temporary injunction would cover the development of future AI models and the way the company is allowed to speak about its product, according to the motion [1].
The request follows similar legislative efforts elsewhere, including California's package of digital regulations that expands government oversight of social media and artificial intelligence under the banner of child protection, raising concerns over privacy, surveillance, and censorship, according to NaturalNews.com [8].
Lawmakers have also debated the GUARD Act, which would require AI chatbot companies to verify the age of users before allowing access, according to another report from NaturalNews.com [9].
The case remains in state court, and the court is asked to impose the measures while litigation is ongoing, court records showed [1]. OpenAI has not yet responded to the new motion, and the court has not issued a ruling on the request [1].
Observers said the outcome could affect age verification and privacy practices for AI platforms in Florida and beyond. The filing's reliance on the Florida Digital Bill of Rights and public nuisance law could set a precedent for state-level regulation of AI systems [1].
References
- Ken Macon. "Florida Seeks Court Order Requiring Age Verification for ChatGPT". Reclaim The Net. September 30, 2026.
- "Florida vs. OpenAI: The Fight to ID Every ChatGPT User". Reclaim The Net. June 04, 2026.
- "OpenAI let ChatGPT aid and abet mass shooters, Florida lawsuit claims". BBC News. June 01, 2026.
- Jasper Margaret C. "Your childs legal rights an overview".
- Laura Harris. "AI chatbots provide disturbing responses to high risk suicide queries new study finds". NaturalNews.com. September 07, 2025.
- "Google & AI Startup Settle Teen Suicide Chatbot Lawsuits". ZeroHedge. January 12, 2026.
- Kevin Hughes. "OpenAIs ChatGPT to allow erotic content amid growing concerns over child safety". NaturalNews.com. October 18, 2025.
- "California enacts sweeping digital regulations under the guise of child protection". NaturalNews.com. October 18, 2025.
- Patrick Lewis. "Lawmakers debate the future of AI and online privacy with new GUARD Act proposal". NaturalNews.com. November 03, 2025.
Explainer Infographic
Please contact us for more information.