Everything we’ve been told about climate change has been an elaborate lie. A bombshell report from the U.S. Department of Energy—authored by five eminent scientists—just obliterated decades of politicized junk science peddled by climate alarmists. While the mainstream media censored the findings, the truth remains: CO2 isn’t the enemy. This miracle molecule of life is greening the planet, fueling crop growth, and sustaining life. However, elites continue to push the "Net Zero" climate change agenda, a depopulation scheme disguised as "environmentalism."
Key points:
- The DOE report is a historic take down of the IPCC climate models.
- The IPCC models are wild exaggerations, proven wrong by real-world data.
- Atmospheric CO2 actually supercharges agriculture development.
- Plant growth has surged 25%-50% globally as fossil fuels have become the norm. (ignored by IPCC)
- No acceleration in U.S. extreme weather can be directly tied CO2, yet the media fearmongers, using hurricanes, droughts, and floods as examples of man-made climate change and CO2 increases.
- Solar activity and natural cycles are downplayed in the global warming narrative—climate models "run hot," and fail accuracy tests.
- Net Zero policies are based on trash science—a laughable worst-case scenario used to justify energy tyranny.
Global greening: The CO2 miracle you aren’t allowed to know
The Department of Energy’s report confirms what independent researchers have said for years: CO2 doesn’t doom Earth—it revitalizes it. In 2016, Zhu et al. discovered that 25%-50% of Earth’s vegetated lands experienced significant greening—equivalent to a second continental U.S. But where’s the celebration? Instead, the media broadcasts hurricanes and wildfires as consequences of climate change.
Why? Because acknowledging plant growth and robust agricultural cycles undermines fear-driven policies that the elite want to compel into existence. The IPCC barely mentions CO2 fertilization, a fact buried deep, and never represented in summary reports. Even coral reefs have rebounded, defying "acidification" doomsayers.
Climate models: Elite tools for control, not science
For four decades, climate bureaucrats have relied on doomsday simulations to instill public fear. Yet most of these projections were based on RCP8.5—an emissions scenario long discredited yet still weaponized by activists to justify energy rationing. The report delivers a damning verdict: climate models disagree threefold on warming forecasts, rendering them useless for policy making.
The flaws run deeper. The so-called "hot" models fail basic reality checks, dramatically exaggerating warming while dismissing natural climate variability. Solar activity, oceanic cycles, and observable climate history dismantle alarmist narratives entirely.
Equally deceptive is the Green Blob’s relentless effort to blame CO? for natural disasters. U.S. data shows no trend in hurricanes, tornadoes, or floods over time. Wildfires result primarily from poor forest management, not climate change, while sea level rise shows no alarming acceleration.
Despite this, climate lawsuits—orchestrated by activist-funded groups like World Weather Attribution (WWA)—admit their true motive: ideological "lawfare," not scientific truth. (Notably, Imperial College’s Dr. Friederike Otto, a BBC favorite, oversees this flawed attribution system.)
Net Zero: A mask for authoritarianism
The report exposes the reality behind the hysteria. CO? benefits ecosystems, models remain unreliable, and "Net Zero" is not scientific policy—it’s a mechanism for control. This is something that NaturalNews has been reporting on for years now. Now the Department of Energy is finally recognizing this conspiracy and taking proactive steps to debunk the climate change agenda. Leftist elites push energy poverty, depopulation, and economic collapse while China, India, and the BRICS nations reject climate dogma, securing industrial dominance as the West self-destructs.
The charade is over. Climate alarmism was never about saving the planet—it’s about power. Will the media finally report the truth? Or keep lying for power?
Sources include:
Energy.gov [PDF]
Please contact us for more information.