In a ruling that sends shockwaves through the conscience of America, a federal judge has callously dismissed the suffering of a New York firefighter left with permanent heart damage after being coerced into taking a second COVID-19 shot—despite already suffering a life-threatening reaction to the first dose! U.S. District Judge Brian M. Cogan’s decision is not only a slap in the face to medical freedom but a chilling endorsement of corporate and government tyranny, stripping individuals of their right to bodily autonomy while shielding those responsible for irreversible harm.
The ruling weaponizes the same faulty precedent (Jacobson v. Massachusetts) that progressive elites and medical authoritarians have twisted for over a century to justify forced medical experimentation. But let’s be clear: Jacobson never granted states the power to force injections on unwilling individuals. It merely allowed small fines for non-compliance—not the destruction of careers, livelihoods, and health. What Judge Cogan has done isn’t jurisprudence; it’s judicial malpractice, trampling on fundamental rights and handing vaccine industry criminals yet another free pass to maim without consequence.
Key points:
- Federal Judge Brian M. Cogan ruled against firefighter O’Brian Pastrana, who suffered permanent heart damage after being forced to take a second COVID shot following a severe allergic reaction to the first.
- The judge absurdly claimed Pastrana had a "choice"—either submit to the dangerous medical intervention or lose his career, family’s income, and ability to survive.
- The ruling falsely invokes Jacobson v. Massachusetts, ignoring its explicit protections against forcing medical procedures on those at risk of harm.
- Pastrana’s attorneys warn this decision sets a terrifying precedent: Employers can mandate life-threatening procedures without accountability, effectively turning workplaces into medical dictatorships.
The cruel logic and enabling of coercion
O’Brian Pastrana, a decorated firefighter, ultimately acquiesced to the vaccine mandates out of fear—fear of losing his job, his home, and his ability to provide for his wife and children. After his first dose of the COVID vaccine in October 2021, his body revolted violently—hives, swelling, and prolonged allergic reactions sent him repeatedly to the ER. But when he begged for a medical exemption, the FDNY demanded an impossible condition: Prove you’re allergic—through a test they knew couldn’t be performed while he was on medication to control his reaction.
Trapped between medical violence and economic ruin, Pastrana took the second shot. The result? Myocarditis, permanent heart damage, and an early, forced retirement on half of his taxed salary. Now, he watches helplessly as bills pile up, his wife works relentless overtime, and foreclosure looms over his family.
Yet Judge Cogan, cloaked in judicial indifference, declared this monstrous coercion a "free choice." This clown judge actually believes that the employer has a right to discriminate, intimidate, and terminate an employee by coercing that employee to show proof they complied with a medical experiment - even after he was injured by it.
The ghost of Jacobson: A precedent twisted and betrayed
The judge leaned heavily on Jacobson v. Massachusetts, the 1905 case often misused to justify forced vaccination. But here’s the truth mainstream media won’t tell you: Jacobson explicitly forbade mandates that endanger individuals. The Supreme Court warned it would be "cruel and inhuman in the last degree" to force vaccination on someone medically at risk. This is exactly what happened to Pastrana. So the clown judge gets away with twisting the Jacobson v. Massachusetts ruling, all to side with the abuser in this situation.
Furthermore, Jacobson only approved a $5 fine for the unvaccinated subject—not career destruction. This ruling stretches the Jacobson precedent beyond recognition, erasing medical exemptions entirely and green-lighting workplace medical tyranny. Attorney Sujata Gibson puts it bluntly: "At what point does this not become like the Hunger Games?"
The frightening future of Medical Tyranny
If this ruling stands, no one is safe. Employers—backed by government force—can demand any medical procedure, no matter how dangerous, with zero recourse for those injured. Christina Martinez, Pastrana’s attorney, warns: "Mr. Pastrana didn’t just lose his job—he lost his health... That is not a free choice; it’s coercion."
The implications are horrifying. Will nurses be forced into annual gene therapies? Will teachers be injected with untested mRNA boosters under threat of termination? And when will judges stop treating vaccine-injured Americans as collateral damage in Big Pharma’s profit-driven experiment?
The answer is simple: Never—unless we fight back. Every ruling like this one proves the system is rigged. Courts no longer exist to protect the people; they exist to shield the powerful. But the truth remains: Coercion is not consent. Injury demands justice. And judges who mock medical tyranny have no legitimacy. Pastrana’s case must be appealed—but more than that, every employer who enforced these deadly unlawful mandates must face consequences. The time for polite debate is over. The time for resistance is now.
Sources include:
ChildrensHealthDefense.org 2 [PDF]
Please contact us for more information.