On Monday, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) warned against U.S. economic warfare and vowed to protect its legitimate rights. The statement was made by MFA spokesman Lin Jian in the Chinese capital Beijing, according to reports. [1]
This development comes as U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent unveiled what he called "Operation Economic Outcast," a new phase of sanctions targeting nearly 60 entities, individuals and vessels across Iran's oil, nuclear, missile and cyber networks. The measures are designed to punish "enablers" of Iran that purchase its oil and facilitate financial flows. [2][3]
Lin said U.S. pressure policies and sanctions only lead to escalation and serve no one's interests, according to reports. He called on all parties involved to act rationally and avoid measures that may further escalate tensions or hurt global economic growth, signaling Beijing's broader concern about the destabilizing impact of the conflict on world markets. [1]
Beijing stated it will closely watch developments and do what is necessary to protect its legitimate rights and interests, the spokesman said. The response underscores a growing rift between Washington and Beijing over how to handle the Iran situation, which has entered its sixth month since the U.S. launched military operations on Feb. 28, 2026. [1][4]
Bessent publicly warned third-party nations trading with Iran face secondary sanctions, specifically noting the potential consequences for China. "Keep in mind, the Chinese get 50% of their energy from the Gulf. So, it would do them a big service to get with the program," Bessent told CNBC according to a report from Antiwar.com. [5]
The U.S. Department of the Treasury's action against Chinese entities has been escalating for months. [5] China's Ministry of Commerce stated its opposition to unilateral sanctions lacking United Nations authorization, rejecting the premise of Washington's campaign.
This stance aligns with Beijing's broader position on economic statecraft, which it views as a tool of coercion. China came under U.S. sanctions earlier this year for energy cooperation with Iran. [6] The standoff highlights how the U.S. maximum pressure strategy is increasingly targeting China as the primary enabler of Iran's economy. [7]
Iran has responded to the U.S. economic pressure by maintaining its grip on the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime passage responsible for 20% of global oil and one-third of LNG exports, according to reports. [8] The new sanctions came as Iran announced sanctions on vessels violating its regulations in the waterway, which has been effectively shut due to the U.S. attacks that began in late February. [8][9]
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the U.S. "Economic D-Day" would bring Washington further defeat, according to reports. [10] A report from the Ron Paul Institute noted that Iran's oil trade has moved out of the dollar entirely, settling in Chinese yuan through China's CIPS clearing network beyond the reach of U.S. sanctions, signaling a fundamental shift in global financial architecture. [11] The deepening ties between Tehran and Beijing, including military agreements for Chinese shoulder-fired missile systems, underscore how the economic war is driving further strategic alignment between the two nations. [12]
The standoff over the Strait of Hormuz and the escalating economic war illustrates the conflicting positions between U.S. pressure tactics and the resistance from China and Iran. The closure of the Strait affects global energy prices, with China having absorbed some of the supply shock through its vast stockpiles and reduced crude imports, according to a report. [13] However, the broader impact on global markets remains significant.
China continues to oppose unilateral sanctions and will protect its interests amid the escalating U.S.-Iran tensions. The conflict has transformed into a broader geopolitical struggle, with Iran's alliances with Russia and China underscoring the limits of American economic statecraft. [14] As Bessent pushes forward with what he described as "the single greatest financial offensive ever" on a nation, the effectiveness of such measures remains uncertain given Iran's history of adapting to sanctions and the growing alternative financial networks. [15]