Richard Terrell, one of the first Americans to receive Johnson & Johnson’s (J&J) Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) injection, reported suffering a severe full-body rash that caused much of his skin to become inflamed, turn red, and ultimately peel off his body.
The 74-year-old resident of Goochland developed the strange symptoms about four days after getting jabbed. He had to be rushed to the emergency room for treatment, without which he could have died, doctors say.
“I began to feel a little discomfort in my armpit and then a few days later I began to get an itchy rash, and then after that I began to swell and my skin turned red,” Terrell told local news station WRIC.
“It all just happened so fast,” Terrell added about how quickly the rash spread all over his entire body. “My skin peeled off. It was stinging, burning, and itching. Whenever I bent my arms or legs, like the inside of my knee, it was very painful where the skin was swollen and was rubbing against itself.”
Dr. Fnu Nutan, a dermatologist and one of Terrell’s attending doctors, admitted to WRIC that the horrific reaction was, in fact, caused by J&J’s Chinese virus injection.
“We ruled out all the viral infections, we ruled out COVID-19 itself, we made sure that his kidneys and liver was okay, and finally we came to the conclusion that it was the vaccine that he had received that was the cause,” she is quoted as saying.
“Skin is the largest organ in the body, and when it gets inflamed like his was, you can lose a lot of fluids and electrolytes.”
To learn more about the injuries and deaths being caused by Wuhan flu shots, visit ChemicalViolence.com.
Despite these horrors, Nutan remain steadfast in advocating for Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccination.” She claims the jab from J&J is still safe and effective, regardless of Terrell’s skin reaction.
“If you look at the risk for adverse reaction for the vaccine it’s really, really low,” Nutan contends. “We haven’t seen a great concern at all. I am a big proponent of the vaccine.”
Other news outlets are claiming that the J&J injection may, in fact, be “superior” to its counterparts from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna.
According to Nutan, anyone receiving any of these injections should be fine. If not, all they have to do is monitor the situation and rush to a nearby hospital should they develop deadly side effects.
“I wouldn’t hesitate to get it,” Nutan told WRIC.
Another concern with the J&J jab, at least for Roman Catholics, is the presence of ingredients derived from aborted human fetal tissue.
The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) issued a warning to parishioners that they should avoid getting the J&J injection because unborn children were murdered in order to create it.
The Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) is joining the Catholics in opposing the J&J jab, though the SBC is fully on board with the other jabs.
Commenters responding to the news have all sorts of questions including why governments are allowing the J&J jab to be administered but not the AstraZeneca one, at least in numerous European countries. Others pointed out once again that these so-called “vaccines” are experimental gene therapy injections.
“Remember, these are not vaccines and should not be called as such,” wrote one person at the Daily Mail Online. “It is illegal for the government to even be calling them vaccines.”
“They call them vaccines so the pharmaceutical companies are not liable for any deaths or adverse side effects they cause. These are mRNA injections that are still experimental.”
Sources for this article include: