Key points:
Roy Singham is no ordinary expatriate. After selling his tech company ThoughtWorks, he relocated to Shanghai and began bankrolling a constellation of organizations including Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research, BreakThrough News, and the now-defunct Dongsheng News. While presenting as independent progressive voices, these groups consistently echo CCP talking points. Investigations reveal Singham’s ventures share office space in a Shanghai skyscraper with Shanghai Maku Cultural Communications, a firm dedicated to “telling China’s story well” to foreign audiences. U.S. nonprofit filings show Singham’s network has funneled over $9 million to Maku, blurring any line between independent activism and state-aligned propaganda production.
Singham’s activities in China are embraced by the party-state. He writes under a Chinese name, “Luo Yi,” for the nationalist outlet Guancha, which Reporters Without Borders labels “Chinese propaganda media.” His 174-page report, “Understanding Who Saved Humanity,” which absurdly recasts World War II as a victory of socialism over Anglo-American capital, was debuted at a forum co-hosted by Tricontinental and East China Normal University, an institution with ties to China’s military-industrial complex. The forum featured singing of “The Internationale” and was covered by Chinese state media giants. This is not the activity of a mere activist, but of a man embedded within China’s influence infrastructure.
The strategy extends beyond publishing pamphlets. A key tactic is the identification and promotion of sympathetic American voices, laundering CCP-aligned narratives through domestic commentators. The most prominent example is Jackson Hinkle, a social media influencer who promotes “MAGA Communism” and lavishes praise on Xi Jinping, Vladimir Putin, and Iran-backed militant groups. Hinkle is not ignored in China; he is celebrated.
CCP-linked platforms have rolled out the red carpet for him. He was hosted in Shanghai, interviewed by pro-CCP scholar Zhang Weiwei, and featured in panel discussions with titles like “When MAGA Communism meets Chinese Marxism,” produced by the Singham-linked Wave Media. These segments were then amplified across Chinese social media platforms with hundreds of millions of subscribers. Guancha published multiple articles fawning over Hinkle’s travels and ideology. This coordinated amplification transforms a fringe American figure into an international phenomenon, with his anti-U.S., pro-China messaging beamed back into the global information ecosystem.
This manipulation of discourse targets the raw nerves of American political division. By boosting voices that hysterically condemn U.S. “imperialism” and “fascism,” the CCP’s propaganda partners aim to deepen domestic strife, erode trust in national institutions, and legitimize China’s authoritarian model as a righteous alternative. It is a form of ideological warfare that exploits America’s open society, using its own values of free speech and dissent as weapons against it.
The sheer scale of this network has finally drawn serious scrutiny from U.S. lawmakers. The House Oversight Committee has voted to subpoena Singham. House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith has detailed how Singham’s Chinese consultancy, Shanghai Luoweixing, has a CCP branch secretary within its leadership. Smith’s letters paint a picture of a network “far more entrenched in CCP-aligned networks than public reports have suggested,” warning that Singham’s U.S. nonprofits may “serve as foreign principals for CCP-aligned influence campaigns.”
The historical irony is thick. For years, U.S. officials warned about the potential for Chinese tech like Huawei routers to contain back-doors for espionage. Now, evidence suggests a different kind of infiltration: ideological back-doors built into our media landscape. This network represents a pipeline where funds from a CCP-enmeshed billionaire flow to U.S. groups that produce content, which is then boosted by the CCP’s global media apparatus, creating a feedback loop of anti-American propaganda.
This is not about silencing criticism of the United States, which is a vital national tradition. This is about exposing a coordinated scheme where that criticism is being funded, shaped, and magnified by a foreign adversary that seeks to dismantle the U.S.-led world order. The Singham network reveals a chilling blueprint: how to hollow out authentic dissent and replace it with a managed opposition that ultimately sings Beijing’s tune.
Sources include: