A number of experts in the field have compiled a report documenting Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) "vaccine"-related mortality rates throughout the Southern Hemisphere. The information it contains is so damning that the authors are now calling for an immediate end to the prioritization of old people for first injection.
The report, entitled "COVID-19 vaccine-associated mortality in the Southern Hemisphere," is authored by Denis G. Rancourt, Marine Baudin, Joseph Hickey and Jérémie Mercier. It proves, based on data collected from 17 different countries, that there is a causal link between many of the "peaks" that occurred in all-cause mortality and the rapid rollout of COVID jabs through Operation Warp Speed.
The nations studied include Argentina, Australia, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Malaysia, New Zealand, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Singapore, South Africa, Suriname, Thailand and Uruguay, which comprise 9.1 percent of the worldwide population, and 10.3 percent of worldwide COVID jab injection.
These nations and the data collected from them demonstrate a vaccination rate of 1.91 injections per person among all ages. The data also covers nearly every COVID jab type and manufacturer across four continents.
"In the 17 countries, there is no evidence in all-cause mortality (ACM) by time data of any beneficial effect of COVID-19 vaccines," the report states. "There is no association in time between COVID-19 vaccination and any proportionate reduction in ACM. The opposite occurs."
"All 17 countries have transitions to regimes of high ACM, which occur when the COVID-19 vaccines are deployed and administered. Nine of the 17 countries have no detectable excess ACM in the period of approximately one year after a pandemic was declared on 11 March 2020 by the World Health Organization (WHO), until the vaccines are rolled out (Australia, Malaysia, New Zealand, Paraguay, Philippines, Singapore, Suriname, Thailand, Uruguay).
(Related: A shockingly high number of young people are dying from "turbo" cancers as a result of getting "vaccinated" for COVID.)
Each new "booster" shot brought even more death
In the Southern Hemisphere, which has opposite seasons to those of the Northern Hemisphere, there were unprecedented peaks in ACM that occurred in those countries' summer period in 2022, which peaks between January and February. These peaks synchronized with or were immediately preceded by the rapid rollout of COVID "booster" shots, which started arriving about a year or so after the initial dose series were unleashed.
"Synchrony between the many peaks in ACM (in 17 countries, on 4 continents, in all elderly age groups, at different times) and associated rapid booster rollouts allows this firm conclusion regarding causality, and accurate quantification of COVID-19 vaccine toxicity," the report states.
As many have been warning for some time now, the report further explains that the overall risk of death from getting jabbed for COVID is much, much higher than claimed in the Big Pharma-led clinical trials that were presented to government regulators as evidence that the shots are safe and effective, which we now know they are not.
"The overall risk of death induced by injection with the COVID-19 vaccines in actual populations, inferred from excess all-cause mortality and its synchronicity with rollouts, is globally pervasive and much larger than reported in clinical trials, adverse effect monitoring and cause-of-death statistics from death certificates, by three orders of magnitude (1,000-fold greater)."
From this, the authors concluded that the shots need to not be given to the elderly, but why only that age group? Are they saying they still think younger people should be forcibly injected, but that older people should be spared? Why the need for this distinction?
The report makes it abundantly clear that COVID jabs are toxic to everyone and that they do not save lives, describing them as "lethal toxic agents." Should they not then be pulled from the market entirely and no longer given to anyone, young people included?
The report also declares that its findings "are conclusive," meaning it is no longer up for debate. The associations, it explains, are numerous and systematic, "and there are no counter examples." No evidence whatsoever was uncovered to suggest that there are any benefits at all to getting jabbed for COVID.
"If vaccines prevented transmission, infection or serious illness, then there should be decreases in mortality following vaccine rollouts, not increases, as in every observed elderly age group subjected to rapid booster rollouts," it further states. "And, mortality would not increase solely when vaccines are rolled out, where no excess mortality occurs prior to vaccine rollout."
"There can be little doubt that the mass COVID-19 vaccination campaigns caused the temporarily associated excess mortality in the 17 countries of the present study, and in other countries studied to date ... we conclude with a high degree of certainty that adverse-effect monitoring, clinical trial reports and death-certificate statistics greatly underestimate the fatal toxicity of the injections."
How many more people have to die before the COVID criminals are held to account for their crimes against humanity? Learn more at Genocide.news.
Sources for this article include:
Please contact us for more information.